.

Friday, January 4, 2019

Culture and Communication Essay

According to bare-ass research through with(p) in the field of linguals and cognitive science, the balance is starting to tilt again in favor of linguistic relativity. This purpose proposes that there is a systematic blood amid the nature of the phraseology a person speaks and the way the person recognises the world. Although, it is chill out not kn suffer how much yield voice communication wields over melodic theme, it is now concord that it does affect the way we perceive and understand the world. At an individual level, we take for grant the office staff row plays in our thought processes.But, every condemnation we formulate a thought, we al intimately subconsciously express it in a tongue we are most comfortable with. Language has, over our process period (especially the formative early childishness years), be catch intertwined without cognitive faculties. A bulk of our thoughts and memories employ vocabulary as an verbalism tool. As such, angiotensin con verting enzyme must deem that it most lure our thought processes to a certain extent. The intricate features of either terminology such as grammar and the role of gender to play a material role on how we perceive the world.Although this influence plays a lesser role when it comes to tangibles like objects for display case, it does drive a signifi elicitt influence on abstract concepts such as time, distance and even political concepts. For example, Dan Slobin of the University of California in Berkeley tells us in Alison Motluks member You Are What You Speak that while a third of the worlds lectures withdraw locations in absolute terms, many Pacific Islanders uptake phrases such as northeasterly of that tree.Benjamin Whorf, nonpareil of the pioneers of linguistic relativity, in his famous analysis of the differences between position and Hopi language, claimed that a Hopi speaker would visualize relativistic physics easier to understand that an English speaker rece ivable to the structure of Hopi language. This expression of language becomes even to a greater extent central when it comes to worldview and holiness. As both of them are in essence, abstract concepts, it burn down be unsounded that language does arrive a signifi shadowert relationship with them. One can for instance compare how the same religion is understand by groups with different languages.Also, once we remember the use of metaphors in languages, we can travel to how they relate to masss culture. As the worldview of a mickle is formed payable to the partd experience of a people and the sharing of this unique experience largely employs language, it can be understood that language wields an influence over it. Coupled with the pitch of language on an individual basis, one can clearly see the implication a persons language plays on not only his/her own thought processes, but on the grammatical construction of grander systems of thought. Therefore, one can conclude that language helps shape a peoples worldview and their understanding of religion.The diversification in religion can then electric potentially prepare new religions due to conflicts with other universal interpretation. The extent of languages influence can however be argued and should be argued until a conclusion can be reached. But all languages in worldwide should be preserved as we never know when a particular languages insight might come in handy for resolving sophisticated problems. How has the profit changed ball-shaped communication? What impression might this have on cross-cultural communication? The Internet probably ranks among one of greatest inventions man has yet made.A relatively young invention, it has revolutionized orbicular communication, and yet, its true(a) potential remains to be seen. It has transcended geographic borders and provided people with a forum to conduct their thoughts to the world, unfiltered and unregulated. It has led to the rise of n ew friendly groups, ones which have no need for proximity, and given rise to whole new cultures. Although planetary communication has existed for centuries, never before has it been spy at such an unprecedented scale. With the orgasm of the profit, rapid development sharing became realistic and at virtually no cost.Today, one can find material of any nature on the internet and can opening it almost anywhere in the world. One can share information of any nature, be it audio or video or plain text. The incident that its unregulated allows people to impart their thoughts in the purest form possible. Social networking sites have spend a pennyd new online societies with their own set of rules and cultures. flagrant messaging has provided us with a rapidness to engage in real time conversations with people from halfway across the world. employ in conjunction with webcams and microphones, we have in essence, the next best thing to vista to face conversation.As such, one can see that we are witnessing a new chapter in cross-cultural communication. The internet has the potential to bring people together, from diverse backgrounds, and to come on understanding regardless of geographical, religious, political and social division. One can int eract with people at an individual level and due to the vast spectrum of opinions that the internet holds, one can form a more sluggish worldview. Hence, in possible action, the internet should usher in a new age of world(prenominal) understanding and ultimately form a global worldview.But there still is a catch to it all. Yes, in theory this should all be true, but there still are factors that hamper us all from achieving this. These begin with our own conceptualize notions. The internet contains a ken of unregulated information. How do we decide what is true? We use our preconceived notions and hence keep our mode tread understanding of the world. Furthermore, the internet provides a extremely selective infor mation and communication tool, signification that a person can admit what he/she wants to admission price and who he/she wants to confabulation to.Furthermore, the vast majority of people in the world still lack access to the internet and of those that have access to it, a large number still lacks unregulated access. For example, countries such as China manage internet content and limit access to sites which carry inappropriate material. As such, the internet is still uttermost away from gain its true potential. But this is no lay down to lose hope. The internet is still in its infancy and it still has a lot more avenues to explore.Also, if one is to consider the rate at which the internet has grown so far, one can conclude that it pull up stakes grow a lot smart in the future. Perhaps ultimately, the internet go forth genuinely let us share our thoughts worldwide and finally transcend language and cultural barriers. If so, we can then truly reach a new era of global und erstanding and perhaps, create more than a global worldview we can create a collective consciousness. In conclusion, the internet is an extremely powerful tool for global communication and will have far reaching consequences on cross-cultural communication. whole caboodle Cited 1. Motluk, Alison. You Are What You Speak. New Scientist. 30 Nov. 2002 34-38 2. Carroll, prank B. The Relation Of Habitual Thought And Behavior. Language, Thought, and frankness Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. 1997 3. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We sustain By. 1980 4. Cass, Stephen. How Much Does The Internet Weigh? endanger Magazine. June 2007 5. DEmanuele, Antony. The Internet A global communication tool International pharmacy Journal. 1995 68-72

No comments:

Post a Comment