Comparing Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Essay -- essays research pa

examine Malcolm X and Martin Luther KingDuring the twentieth speed of light Black state face a huge amount of disparity from the whites and found it very voiceless to achieve elegant rights. They were at one stage deprived of voting, be entitled the same things as blacks and going to a white school. In order for blacks to achieve civil rights they really essential several(prenominal)one to follow, they needed a leader. Many black leaders did emerge for the fight for civil rights, such as, Malcolm X, James Baldwin, Martin Luther King, Marcus Garvey, some had some ways of thinking some had others. Two of the most powerful and influential leaders of the twentieth century were Malcolm X and Martin Luther King. These devil leaders had incompatible approaches, and different views towards white people, maybe their different approaches of violence and non-violence stem from their original opinions of how capable the whites are of cosmos good, but fought for the same thing. Free dom. These great leaders came from vastly different backgrounds which is shown in their thinking on heart, especially early on. Martin was a Christian from the rural south, whilst Malcolm had become a Muslim from the urban north. King called for be intimate of your neighbor, integration and nonviolence, which was part of his American Dream. Malcolm X called for self-love, separation, and by any substance necessary, which was part of his Black statealism. Throughout their lives their views were constantly changing, largely touch by each other, but also by the many events in their lives. Malcolm X forced King to become much radical and to smack into the problems of the urban north. King made X become more politically active and work much more with the Civil Rights Movement. Although many create often said that they were like oil and water, these two men, and different they may have seemed to be, had the same goal. They wanted to end exploitation, discrimination and racialism. Also, for both, religion was primary in defining their lives and ideals. There are two distinct phases in their political lives. For King, the change in his outlook came when he looked at the social problems of the urban slums, and the extent of racism of his previous allies. This round point came with the riots in Watts, Los Angeles. For Malcolm X, the major change came when he broke from the Nation of Islam and went on his trip to Mec... ...ithin the white communities. This is important because it shows that it is possible for whites and blacks to work together for a single cause. It leaves hope that maybe one day, all traces of racism can disappear and leave behind a united indian lodge in which everyone can work together for the good of the country.So boilers suit Martin Luther King was much more educated then Malcolm X. He had seen life the easy way compared to Malcolm. Martin Luther King hadnt been through what Malcolm had been through, plot Malcolm x was busy being a c riminal, Martin Luther King was busy doing his Ph.D. Malcolm X dog-tired about ten years of his life in jail, which in that clock time he learned to hate the white man, his belief towards whites was they were blue-eyed devils. I think towards the end King became more radical because he became more critical of the government, mainly because King had seen laws being passed and civil rights being achieved politically but still socially he felt that black people hadnt achieved civil rights. The case for Malcolm X is not however the same, while his journey to Mecca Malcolm finds out there are white Muslims, therefor capture that not all white people are devils.