Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act of 2007 Essay

AbstractThe mark of the federal official finale Penalty Act of 2007 (S. 447) is to abolish a wide-range of capitol offenses falling under the Immigration and Nationality Act. This act also commutes the sentences of current and future federal finish penalization felons from the conclusion penalty, to life in prison, without the possibility of parole. general opinion within the enunciate of Michigan and throughout the linked States is a concern, along with the raise up exposure and solvent coverage. The GOP and Democratic parties must impress firm lieus with the issue in the criterion, while certain special invade groups will be making public claims in the media and through the juridical system. Further more than, there are electoral concerns within the State of Michigan that cannot be ignored, as re-election is a reality.HistoryThis enactment has been introduced within the Senate and/or household since 1999, and has likewise been rejected by either the Senate Judicia ry Committee or the House Judiciary Sub-Committee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security each time.1 to begin with introduced by Sen. Russell Feingold D-WI in 1999 and again in 2007, it has carried as many as 46 cosponsors in the House of Representatives while still carrying cardinal in the Senate. Currently, the bill has no cosponsors and has again, been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee for further review, however no major actions have occurred since April, 2007 when introductory remarks were made by Sen. Feingold regarding the issue. (Death Penalty, 2007)Public ruling For 158 years, the Michigan voters have been founded in their unwavering belief for the abolition of the death penalty. Through all of those years, the voters have felt as though the detrimental value outweighed the probative value in accepting the death penalty as a reasonable solution in sentencing standards within the State. Furthermore, the State was the first to abolish the death penalty and Governor John Engler back up the decision to abolish the death penalty by saying, I presuppose Michigan made a wise decision 150 years ago while going on to say, Were pretty dashing of the fact that we dont have the death penalty. Therefore, the publics opinion within the State of Michigan is understood the abolition of the death penalty is more than palatable to the Michigan voters. (Bonner, 2000).Media Todays press coverage, regarding death penalty issues, is not nearly as a center and thorough as it once was. Media conglomerates are decocting more and more on the concept of infotainment, rather than the happenings within the halls of Congress. As a result, demonstrate support for S. 447 would have little coverage, unless the bill made it through the bench committee, House, Senate, and to the Presidents desk without issue. However, history shows that Congress is not ready to strike such a bold step into that direction. Furthermore, press-releases would have to be leaked to the marking and television media in the State in order for voters to notice the issue is level being seriously considered in Washington. Once the media knows that support for the abolition of the death penalty, within the federal judicial system might be a serious topic, then that is when the media coverage will be organize into motion.Political Parties Historically, GOP candidates have affirmed death penalty support, while democratic candidates have vehemently spoken against the practice. However, it is important to note that Gov. Engler is also a Republican supporter of the death penaltys abolition, who has a wonderful amount of influence within the State as the partys leader. It is also important to note that in the past, each time the bill received a cosponsor, a Michigan Senator/Representative was on the list as one. Therefore, with the States political support base and the legislations historical cosponsor trend it is important to give a sign of support.Interest Groups In Michigan, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is one of the primary organizations associated with the abolition of the death penalty. Furthermore, this organization has made serious set ahead in its fight against this form of sentencing within many other States and should therefore, be monitored. Next, Amnesty International is an organization that, like the ACLU, has initiated an anti-death penalty campaign throughout the United States and has also gone abroad to promote its cause. In addition, the Citizens United for Alternatives to the Death Penalty has promoted its idea to restore justice and investigate alternatives to death penalty sentencing. Even with the many anti-death penalty organizations, there are even fewer pro-death penalty organizations with most of which being based in Texas.Elections Because of the occupy to take a stance on this issue, the concern for re-election is very real. This is a deeply rooted cause in the State of Michigan and therefore, it should not be taken lightly. A firm stance and an outspoken docket on initiatives to support this the bills stance is a practicable course of action to take if and when the option of pledging support towards the merits of S. 447 becomes a reality. The only other alternative is to stay silent on the issue and focus on other issues within the agenda that can be communicate and promoted.However, coming out against this legislation is not an option because of the dangers it would pose for re-election purposes. This is because it would show up to be a unilateral decision to ignore the voice and stance of the voters in the State for the purposes of taking on a personal agenda, without sight or care for the constituents of Michigan. Therefore, the only two avenues of approach are sufficient thwarted support, including co-sponsorship of the bill, or silence and the promotion of other legislative issues.References(2007). Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act of 2007. Retrieved December 12, 200 7, from GovTrack.us Web web site http//www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main &bill=s110-447.Bonner, R (2000). States With No Death Penalty Share Lower Homicide Rates. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from Death Penalty knowledge Center Web site http//www.deathpenaltyinfo.org / article. php .Footnotes1 Other bills with the same backup include the following S. 1917 (Status Dead), S. 402 (Status Dead), S. 191 (Status Dead), H.R. 2574 (Status Dead), S. 122 (Status Dead), H.R. 4923 (Status Dead).