Literature Comparison Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Literature Comparison - Essay ExampleThe magnetic attraction must base his or her aura and exceptional gifts on the emotional appeal of their followers. The attractive drawing card can see a clear sight and stimulates the follower to follow it and become unless as elevated as the leader. Negative aspects of the magnetised leader may include streaks of narcissism, self-aggrandizement, and a hale or contrived distance from followers, all in the efforts of maintaining hero status. Miller contrasts the charismatic leader with the transformational, or transforming leader as expounded by Burns, but importantly expanded with Bouldings theory of love. Burns theory defines the transformational leader as one who basically seeks to convert followers into leaders and into moral agents. Bouldings identifies love as a type of power. There is no power outside of human rating. Power integrates human valuation within organizations, and the most fundamental form of integrative power is the powe r of love (p, 184) There is no competitive, opposing, or abusive force in Bouldings concept of power. Merged into Burns view, love becomes the integrator and the change force allowing the transforming leader to empower the follower by letting them have and pursue their own vision, and to modify a dimension of mutual interaction where both leader and follower are being transformed. The leader is able to see that the followers visions can align with that of the organization in a cooperative and sacramental manduction way. Leaders in this way learn from followers just as followers learn from leaders. Whereas the charismatic leader must seek agreement and commitment from followers as to a certain vision he or she is credited with having, the transforming leader offers a context for sharing and participation in the shape of vision making. Weiners shapes a picture of the transformational leader as one who is more combative and confrontational. importantly it is based on the theories of educator Paulo Freire. Freire pursued his theories from a personal knowledge of poverty and hunger and basically sought to make geomorphologic changes in the way education was being delivered to the poor. Weiner portrays the leader as doing oppositional hit but working within the ethnic hegemony as theorized by Antonio Gramsci. Gramsi refined Marxism to recognize that there was a civil society that was accepted by most people. This society had values and beliefs that formed a hegemony. Gramsi believed that this cultural hegemony could be changed from the inside, gradually, without a violent overthrow. This was basically Frieres belief, that he could educate the poor and that they themselves could bring structural change upon society. Weiner writes as if teachers are continuously battling neoliberal and right wing ideology. But he accepts Freires message as one of social justice and democracy. Freire dedicated his life to serving the poor. Through his pattern Weiner is able to define the transformational leader as an activist one who is dedicated to change but who, importantly, works within the dominant structures of power and authority to serve the poor (p. 91). Today we can ask ourselves what kinds of leaders are appropriate in a world that has just experienced a great scotch recession and the wants and needs of the poor and have-nots have become more sharp and bare? Miller mention the charismatic corporation heads who seem to continuously highlight themselves today,